A Guide to Deradicalisation & Disengagement Programming: Designing and Implementing Interventions through the Lens of the ABC Model
This report focuses on interventions designed to promote and facilitate exits from ideologically justified violence – often referred to as ‘tertiary’ interventions. The beneficiaries of these programmes include individuals convicted of terrorism charges, as well as those who voluntarily disengaged. Relying on the authors’ Attitudes-Behaviours Corrective (ABC) Model of Violent Extremism (Khalil et al., 2022), and drawing from their extensive professional experiences of providing technical support to such interventions, this report presents a novel framework to help practitioners develop and implement these programmes.
There is considerable disagreement among thematic experts as to whether these interventions should treat disengagement or deradicalisation as their overarching objective. While the former refers to voluntary exits from violence, the latter is widely (although not universally) interpreted in relation to attitudinal change. We incorporate both of these concepts into our framework of change (our ‘results chain’ using Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) language), treating disengagement as the uppermost objective (our desired ‘impact’), and deradicalisation as a subordinate aim (an ‘intermediate impact’). Viewed in this manner, attitudinal change provides only one of several avenues through which disengagement may be achieved.
Below these uppermost objectives, our framework also incorporates the following mid-level aims (‘outcomes’):
- Outcome 1 - Networks: Reduced ties to malign influencers and enhanced ties to prosocial alternatives
- Outcome 2 - Identity: Diminished salience of social identities associated with violence
- Outcome 3 - Ideology: Enhanced willingness to question beliefs that legitimise and justify violence
- Outcome 4 - Needs: Enhanced ability to achieve personal needs through nonviolent means
- Outcome 5 - Wellbeing: Improved psychological wellbeing
As shall become apparent, many different initiatives (‘activities’) can contribute to these desired outcomes, including basic education, vocational training, religious guidance, family support, psychological support, and so on. We make no a priori assumptions about which of these are most likely to help achieve any particular outcome, with this varying substantially between contexts and clients. Indeed, it is for this reason we argue that these programmes should reflect local contexts, and be tailored to the needs of each beneficiary.
Our key recommendations are as follows:
- Treat deradicalisation as one avenue through which to achieve disengagement: As already observed, there is considerable disagreement among experts as to whether tertiary interventions should treat disengagement or deradicalisation as their overarching aim. Departing from these interpretations, we instead argue that attitudinal change provides one of several avenues through which disengagement may be achieved. As such, all programmes should incorporate interventions that promote deradicalisation, and these should be available to beneficiaries at suitable junctures and in appropriate ‘doses’ during their rehabilitation. This applies even in locations (most often in the Global North) where it may be considered expedient to avoid framing tertiary interventions in terms of deradicalisation.
- Promote change in relation to the social networks, identity, ideology, needs, and psychological wellbeing of clients: Research has identified the five outcomes in our results chain as key leverage points through which individuals can be supported or incentivised to move away from violence. These outcomes often operate as collaborators in pursuit of sustained disengagement, particularly where they generate mutually reinforcing effects. For instance, the establishment of prosocial networks (Outcome 1) may provoke identity change (Outcome 2), which may then further strengthen these new social connections (Outcome 1), and so on. However, there are also contexts in which they are better interpreted as alternative avenues through which disengagement may be pursued.
- Ensure programmes reflect local requirements, conditions, and cultures: A core underpinning premise of the approach presented in this paper is that programmes must be context specific. Perhaps most obviously, while prison programmes should place a heavy emphasis on addressing identity and ideology (Outcomes 2 and 3), these factors are often less critical for interventions with 'low risk' individuals involved in this violence who were never actually sympathetic to its objectives or identified with those involved. It is also important to recognise that many programmes are constrained by resource restrictions and capacity issues, limiting the extent to which they can provide comprehensive services under each of the outcomes listed above.
- Ensure interventions are tailored to individual clients: For instance, educational and vocational provisions should reflect the existing skillsets of each beneficiary, their personal preferences, and the labour market in the community where they will return. For clients motivated by religious ideologies, the timing and extent of religious engagements should also be carefully considered, and only gradually introduced in certain contexts. Perhaps most obviously, Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) provisions must also be tailored to personal needs. To help personalize these services, interventions should be delivered through an integrated case management system that includes a means of assessing client needs; develops tailored case management plans; coordinates information from all stakeholders involved in programme delivery; and supports exit processes.
- Ensure that intervention providers are suitably qualified and experienced, and that they maintain supportive relationships with their clients: While this report primarily focuses on what needs to be achieved, rather than how these interventions should be undertaken, it is difficult to understate the importance of the relationship between intervention providers and their clients. Indeed, trust and rapport are routinely identified as a critical determinant of programme success. These providers must also be suitably qualified and experienced in their specialist areas (as psychologists, social workers, mentors, and so on), and have a sufficient understanding of the causes and manifestations of ideologically justified violence.
- Invest in measuring programmatic success as a matter of urgency: Unfortunately, there remains limited empirical evidence demonstrating the extent to which tertiary interventions actually achieve their desired objectives (however stated), and the mechanisms through which any successes are achieved. This represents a critical concern that must be addressed. Those tasked with implementing tertiary programmes should be aware that there are many different methods through which these interventions may be evaluated, all with prominent strengths and weaknesses.
Altier, Mary Beth, Christian Thoroughgood & John Horgan, “Turning away from Terrorism: Lessons from Psychology, Sociology and Criminology”, Journal of Peace Studies 51, no. 5 (2014), 647-661.
Barkindo, Atta & Shane Bryans, “De-Radicalising Prisoners in Nigeria: Developing a Basic Prison Based De-Radicalisation Programme,” Journal of Deradicalization 7, (2016), 1–25.
Barrelle, Kate, “Pro-integration: Disengagement from and Life after Extremism,” Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 7, no. 2 (2015), 129–142.
Berntzen, Lars Erik, & Sandberg, Sveinung, “The Collective Nature of Lone Wolf Terrorism: Anders Behring Breivik and the Anti-Islamic Social Movement,” Terrorism and Political Violence 26, no. 5 (2014), 759–779.
Betancourt, Theresa, Robert T Brennan, Julia Rubin-Smith, Garrett M Fitzmaurice & Stephen E Gilman, “Sierra Leone’s Former Child Soldiers: A Longitudinal Study of Risk, Protective Factors, and Mental Health,” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 49, no. 6 (2010), 606-615.
Bjørgo, Tore, “Processes of Disengagement from Violent Groups on the Extreme Right,” in Leaving Terrorism Behind: Individual and Collective Disengagement, edited by Tore Bjørgo and John Horgan (London, UK: Routledge, 2008).
Braddock, Kurt, Weaponized Words: The Strategic Role of Persuasion in Violent Radicalization and Counter-Radicalization (London, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Breivik, Anders, 2083: A European Declaration of Independence
Boucek, Christopher, “Extremist Re-education and Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia,” in Leaving Terrorism Behind: Individual and Collective Disengagement, edited by Tore Bjørgo and John Horgan (London, UK: Routledge, 2008).
Cherney, Adrian, “Supporting Disengagement and Reintegration: Qualitative Outcomes from a Custody Based Counter Radicalisation Intervention,” Journal for Deradicalization, no. 17 (2018-9), 1-27.
Cherney, Adrian, “Evaluating Interventions to Disengage Extremist Offenders: A Study of the Proactive Integrated Support Model (PRISM),” Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 12, no. 1 (2020), 17-36.
Cherney, Adrian, “The Release and Community Supervision of Radicalised Offenders: Issues and Challenges that Can Influence Reintegration,” Terrorism and Political Violence 33, iss. 1 (2021), 119-137.
Christensen, Tina Wilchen, “Civil Actors’ Role in Deradicalisation and Disengagement Initiatives: When Trust is Essential,” in Routledge Handbook of Deradicalisation and Disengagement, edited by Stig Jarle Hansen & Stian Lid (Oxon, UK: Routledge, 2020).
Clubb, Gordon, “From Terrorists to Peacekeepers: The IRA’s Disengagement and the Role of Community Networks,” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 37, iss. 10 (2014), 842-861.
Collins, Eamon, Killing Rage (London, UK: Granta Books, 1998).
Copeland, Simon, & Sarah Marsden, Managing Terrorism-Related Offenders in Prison (Lancaster: Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats, 2020).
Corner, Emily & Paul Gill, “A False Dichotomy? Mental Illness and Lone-Actor Terrorism,” Law & Human Behavior 39, no. 1 (2015), 23-34.
Corner, Emily & Paul Gill, “Psychological Distress, Terrorist Involvement and Disengagement from Terrorism: A Sequence Analysis Approach,” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 36 (2020), 499-526.
Corner, Emily, Paul Gill, & Oliver Mason “Mental Health Disorders and the Terrorist: A Research Note Probing Selection Effects and Disorder Prevalence,” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 39, no. 6 (2016), 560–568.
Corner, Emily, Helen Taylor, Isabelle Van Der Vegt, Nadine Salman, Bettina Rottweiler, Florian Hetzel, Caitlin Clemmow, Norah Schulten & Paul Gill, “Reviewing the Links between Violent Extremism and Personality, Personality Disorders and Psychopathy,” The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 32, iss. 3 (2021), 378-407.
Dean, Christopher, “The Health Identity Intervention: The UK’s Development of a Psychologically Informed Intervention to Address Extremist Offending,” in Prisons, Terrorism and Extremism: Critical Issues in Management, Radicalisation and Reform, edited by Andrew Silke (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014).
Denoeux, Guilain & Lynn Carter, Guide to the Drivers of Violent Extremism (USAID, 2009).
Edwards, Phil, “How (not) to Create Ex-Terrorists: Prevent as Ideological Warfare,” in Counter-Radicalisation: Critical Perspectives, edited by Christopher Baker-Ball, Charlotte Heath-Kelly, and Lee Jarvis (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014), 54-70.
Elshimi, Mohammed, “Desistance and Disengagement Programme in the UK Prevent Strategy: A Public Health Analysis,” in Routledge Handbook of Deradicalisation and Disengagement, edited by Stig Jarle Hansen & Stian Lid (Oxon, UK: Routledge, 2020).
El-Said, Hamed, New Approaches to Countering Terrorism: Designing and Evaluating Counter Radicalization and De-Radicalization Programs (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).
Ferguson, Neil, & James W. McAuley, “Dedicated to the Cause: Identity Development and Violent Extremism,” European Psychologist 26, no.1 (2021), 6-14.
Florez-Morris, Mauricio, “Joining Guerrilla Groups in Colombia: Individual Motivations and Processes for Entering a Violent Organization,” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 30, iss. 7 (2007), 615-634.
García‑Calvo, Carola & Álvaro Vicente, “Extremist Offender Management in Spain,” in Extremist Offender Management in Europe: Country Reports, edited by Rajan Basra & Peter R, Neumann (London: International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation, 2020).
García Membrives, María Teresa & Rogelio Alonso, “Countering Violent Extremism in Spain: Analysing the Intervention with Young Jihadi Convicted of Membership of a Terrorist Organization,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, in print.
Gerring, John “Ideology: A Definitional Analysis,” Political Research Quarterly 50, no. 4 (1997), 957-994.
Gill, Paul & Corner, Emily, “There and Back Again: The Study of Mental Disorder and Terrorist Involvement,” American Psychologist 72, no. 3 (2017), 231–241.
Gill, Paul, Caitlin Clemmow, Florian Hetzel, Bettina Rottweiler, Nadine Salman, Isabelle Van Der Vegt, Zoe Marchment, Sandy Schumann, Sanaz Zolghadriha, Norah Schulten, Helen Taylor & Emily Corner, “Systematic Review of Mental Health Problems and Violent Extremism,” The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 32, iss. 1 (2021), 51-78.
Glazzard, Andrew, “Violent Extremist Disengagement and Reintegration: A Framework for Planning, Design, and Evaluation of Programmatic Interventions,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, in print.
Hamilton, Malcolm, “The Elements of the Concept of ideology,” Political Studies 35, no. 1 (1987), 18-38.
Harris-Hogan, Shandon, Kate Barrelle, & Andrew Zammit, “What is Countering Violent Extremism? Exploring CVE Policy and Practice in Australia”, Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 8, no. 1 (2016), 6-24.
Heide-Ottosen, Sif, Yahye Abdi, Abdullahi Ahmed Nor, James Khalil, and Martine Zeuthen, Journeys Through Extremism: The Experiences of Former Members of Al-Shabaab (Resolve Network, 2022).
Holbrook, Donald, The Al-Qaida Doctrine: The Framing and Evolution of the Leadership’s Public Discourse (New York: Bloomsbury, 2014).
Horgan, John, Walking Away from Terrorism: Accounts of Disengagement from Radical and Extremist Movements (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2009).
Horgan, John, The Psychology of Terrorism (Oxon, UK; Routledge, 2014).
Horgan, John, Mary Beth Altier, Neil Shorthand & Max Taylor, “Walking Away: The Disengagement and De-radicalization of a Violent Right-Wing Extremist,” Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 9, no. 2 (2017), 63-77.
Ibrahim, Raymond, The Al-Qaeda Reader (New York: Broadway Books, 2007).
Jonsson, Michael, A Farewell to Arms: Motivational Change and Divergence Inside FARC-EP (Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University, 2014).
Kalyvas, Stathis, & Matthew Adam Kocher, “How ‘Free’ is Free Riding in Civil Wars?: Violence, Insurgency, and the Collective Action Problem,” World Politics 59, no. 2, (2007), 177–216.
Khalil, James, Rory Brown, Chris Chant, Peter Olowo & Nick Wood, Deradicalisation and Disengagement in Somalia: Evidence from a Rehabilitation Programme with Former Members of al-Shabaab (London: Royal United Services Institute, 2019).
Khalil, James, John Horgan & Martine Zeuthen, “The Attitudes-Behaviours Corrective (ABC) Model of Violent Extremism,” Terrorism & Political Violence 34, iss. 3 (2022), 425-450.
Khalil, James, MaryAnne Iwara & Martine Zeuthen, Journeys Through Extremism: The Experiences of Forced Recruits in Boko Haram (Resolve Network, 2022).
Khalil James & Martine Zeuthen, Countering Violent Extremism and Risk Reduction: A Guide to Programme Design and Evaluation (London: Royal United Services Institute, 2016).
Khyber, Lateef Hakim Zai, Shahida Aman & Syed Rashid Ali, “De-Radicalization, Rehabilitation and Re-integration of Juvenile Militants in Pakistan: A Case Study of Sabaoon,” NUST Journal of International Peace & Stability 5, no. 2 (2022), 1-16.
Koehler, Daniel, Understanding Deradicalization: Methods, Tools, and Programs for Countering Violent Extremism (Oxon: Routledge, 2017).
Kruglanski, Arie, Jocelyn Bélanger & Rohan Gunaratna, The Three Pillars of Radicalization: Needs, Narratives, and Networks (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019).
Lewis, James & Sarah Marsden, Trauma, Adversity and Violent Extremism (Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats, 2021).
Lösel, Friedrich, Doris Bender, Irina Jugl & Sonja King, “Resilience against Political and Religious Extremism, Radicalization, and Related Violence: A Systematic Review of Studies on Protective Factors,” in Understanding Recruitment to Organized Crime and Terrorism, edited by David Weisburd, Ernesto Savona, Badi Hasisi & Fransceso Calderoni (Cham: Springer, 2020).
Marsden, Sarah, Reintegrating Extremists: Deradicalisation and Desistance (Lancaster, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).
Maruna, Shadd, Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives (Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2000).
Merari, Ariel, Ilan Diamant, Arie Bibi, Yoav Broshi, & Giora Zakin, “Personality Characteristics of ‘Self-Martyrs’/‘Suicide Bombers’ and Organizers of Suicide Attacks,” Terrorism and Political Violence 22 (2010), 87–101.
Muluk, Hamdi, Ahmad Naufalul Umam & Mirra Noor Milla, “Insights from a Deradicalisation Program in Indonesian Prisons: The Potential Benefits of Psychological Intervention Prior to Ideological Discussion,” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 23, no. 1 (2020), 42-53.
O’Brien, Brendan, The Long War: The IRA & Sinn Féin (Dublin: The O’Brien Press, 1999).
O’Callaghan, Sean, The Informer (London: Corgi Books, 1999).
Paul O’Doherty, Shane, The Volunteer: A Former IRA Man’s True Story (Durham: Strategic Book Group, 2011).
Peracha, Feriha, Sara Savage, Raafia Khan, Asma Ayub & Andleeb Zahra, “Promoting Cognitive Complexity Among Violent Extremist Youth in Northern Pakistan,” Journal of Strategic Security 15 no., 1 (2022), 14-53.
Popkin, Samuel, The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Societies in Vietnam (Berkley: University of California Press, 1979).
Porges, Marisa, “Saudi Arabia’s ‘Soft’ Approach to Terrorist Prisoners: A Model for Others?,” in Prisons, Terrorism and Extremism: Critical Issues in Management, Radicalisation and Reform, edited by Andrew Silke (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014).
Post, Jerrold, The Mind of a Terrorism: The Psychology of Terrorism from the IRA to Al-Qaeda (New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2007).
Post, Jerrold, Keven G. Ruby & Eric D. Shaw, “The Radical Group in Context: 1. An Integrated Framework for the Analysis of Group Risk for Terrorism,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 25, no. 2 (2002), 73-100.
Post, Jerrold, Ehud Sprinzak & Laurita M. Denny, “The Terrorists in their Own Words: Interviews with 35 Incarcerated Middle Eastern Terrorists,” Terrorism and Political Violence 15, no. 1 (2003), 171–184.
Reinares, Fernando. “Exit from Terrorism: A Qualitative Empirical Study on Disengagement and Deradicalization Among Members of ETA,” Terrorism and Political Violence 23, no. 5 (2011), p. 780-803.
Renard, Thomas, “Extremist Offender Management in Belgium,” in Extremist Offender Management in Europe: Country Reports, edited by Rajan Basra & Peter R, Neumann (London: International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation, 2020).
Sageman, Marc, Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).
Sageman, Marc, Turning to Political Violence: The Emergence of Terrorism (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018).
Said, Behnam, “Extremist Offender Management in Germany,” in Extremist Offender Management in Europe: Country Reports, edited by Rajan Basra & Peter R, Neumann (London: International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation, 2020).
Schuurman, Bart, Lasse Lindekilde, Stefan Malthaner, Francis O’Connor, Paul Gill & Noémie Bouhana, “End of the Lone Wolf: The Typology that Should not Have Been,” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 42, no. 8 (2019), 771-778.
Silke, Andrew, “Cheshire Cat Logic: The Recurring Theme of Terrorist Abnormality in Psychological Research,” Psychology, Crime & Law 4, iss. 1 (1998), 51-69.
Silke, Andrew, “Disengagement or Deradicalization: A Look at Prison Programs for Jailed Terrorists,” CTC Sentinel (Vol. 4, No. 1, 2011), 18–21.
Silke, Andrew, & Tinka Veldhuis, “Countering Violent Extremism in Prisons: A Review of Key Recent Research and Critical Research Gaps,” Perspectives on Terrorism 11, no. 5 (2017), 2-11.
Snow, David, “Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields,” in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule and Hanspeter Kriesi (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2007).
Snow David, & Robert D. Benford, “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization,” International Social Movement Research 1 (1988), 197-217.
Stern, Elliot, Nicoletta Stame, John Mayne, Kim Forss, Rick Davies & Barbara Befani, Broadening the Range of Designs and Methods for Impact Evaluations (UK Department for International Development, 2012).
Tarrant, Brenton, The Great Replacement
Taylor, Peter, Provos: The IRA and Sinn Fein (London: Bloomsbury, 1998).
UNODC, Handbook on the Management of Violent Extremist Prisoners and the Prevention of Radicalization to Violence in Prisons (New York, UNODC, 2016).
Van der Heide, Liesbeth, “Extremist Offender Management in the Netherlands,” in Extremist Offender Management in Europe: Country Reports, edited by Rajan Basra & Peter R, Neumann (London: International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation, 2020).
Van der Heide, Liesbeth & Bart Schuurman, “Reintegrating Terrorists in the Netherlands: Evaluating the Dutch approach,” Journal of Deradicalization 17 (2018/19), 196-239.
Webber, David, Marina Chernikova, Arie W. Kruglanski, Michele J. Gelfand, Malkanthi Hettiarachchi, Rohan Gunaratna, Marc-Andre Lafreniere & Jocelyn J. Belanger, “Deradicalizing Detained Terrorists,” Political Psyhcology 39, no. 3 (2018), 539-556.
Wiktorowicz, Quintan, Radical Islam Rising: Muslim Extremism in the West (Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 2005).
Wilson, John, Introduction to Social Movements (New York: Basic Books, 1973).
Wolfowicz, Michael, Yael Litmanovitz, David Weisburd & Badi Hasisi, “Cognitive and Behavioral Radicalization: A Systematic Review of the Putative Risk and Protective Factors,” Campbell Systematic Reviews 17, no. 3 (2021).
Wood, Elisabeth Jean, Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
As part of CREST’s commitment to open access research, this text is available under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 licence. Please refer to our Copyright page for full details.
IMAGE CREDITS: Copyright ©2023 R. Stevens / CREST (CC BY-SA 4.0)