Research into factors that may reduce the likelihood or prevent people from becoming radicalised or engaging in terrorism is underdeveloped. This report provides an overview of how protective factors have been conceptualised and an evidence map identifying empirical studies that have contributed to the field.
- Work on protective factors is in its infancy.
- The majority of work has focused on risk factors, largely neglecting those factors which reduce the potential for negative outcomes or promote positive ones.
- Paying greater attention to protective factors offers opportunities for more effective case management, including:
- Enhancing rapport between individuals and clinicians.
- Nurturing motivation in offenders.
- Better support for intervention planning.
- There is a lack of consensus around how protective factors should be conceptualised.
- Approaches to protective factors have conceptualised them as:
- Reducing risk factors.
- The absence of risk factors.
- Buffers that work to mitigate risk factors.
- Conceptually distinct factors in their own right, unrelated to risk factors.
- Researchers have emphasised that protective factors are likely to operate in complex ways, for example by exhibiting non-linear effects on risk factors, interacting with other factors, or changing over time.
- These complexities have led to calls to view risk and protection holistically rather than as individual factors or in isolation.
- The evidence map is a visual guide based on 51 papers which analyse protective factors relating to violent extremist attitudes, intentions, and behaviours.
- The map should be seen as a top-level guide to the research landscape, which should be interpreted alongside the narrative summary of the evidence which lays out the complexities of the relationships and factors identified in the literature.
- Relatively few studies set out to look at protective factors explicitly. Protective factors are typically identified as a by-product of research looking at risk factors.
- Individual-level factors were the most common type of protective factor in the literature. These were further sub-divided into subgroups encompassing: psychological, socio-demographic, religious, activism and civic attachment factors.
- Additional protective factors were identified under the headings of family, peers, school, and society.
- There are caveats to the evidence map:
- Research focused on different outcome variables, differentiating between extremist attitudes, intentions, and behaviours. Studies focused on extremist attitudes were most common.
- In some cases, the relationships between factors and violent extremism described in the evidence map were not straightforward, for example the relationship between variables may not be linear or may be the result of an interaction between variables.
- Studies often drew from very different contexts, with distinctive features unlikely to be present in other settings. This may limit the potential to generalise findings.
- There was little theory in the evidence base which focused specifically on the idea of protection; the majority of theories related to radicalisation.
- The theoretical accounts that have been developed offer some insight into the mechanics of risk and protective factors, seeking to explain why they are relevant rather than only identifying relationships.
- Using these approaches to consider protective factors required some work to identify the implicit theories that seemed to inform individual studies.
- Most theoretical explanations offered in the evidence base had some connection to criminology, including strain theory, anomie/a, social learning, and social control theories.
- In general, the theoretical evidence suggests that the mechanics of radicalisation are fragile and dependent on the convergence of factors at different levels, suggesting that protective factors stem from limiting adversity, social and psychological mechanisms to deal with adversity that does arise, and insulation from extremist settings.
Abbiati, M., Golay, P., Gasser, J., & Moulin, V. (2020). Protective Factor Assessments: What Are We Measuring? An Investigation of the Internal Validity of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(4), 383-398.
Acevedo, G. A., & Chaudhary, A. R. (2015). Religion, Cultural Clash, and Muslim American Attitudes About Politically Motivated Violence. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 54(2), 242–260. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12185
Adam-Troian, J., Bonetto, E., Araujo, M., Baidada, O., Celebi, E., Dono Martin, M., Eadeh, F., Godefroidt, A., Halabi, S., Mahfud, Y., Varet, F., & Yurtbakan, T. (2020). Positive associations between anomia and intentions to engage in political violence: Cross-cultural evidence from four countries. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 26(2), 217–223. https:// doi.org/10.1037/pac0000385
Agnew, R. (2010). A general strain theory of terrorism. Theoretical Criminology, 14(2), 131–153. https://doi. org/10.1177/1362480609350163
Asal, V., Fair, C. C., & Shellman, S. (2008). Consenting to a Child’s Decision to Join a Jihad: Insights from a Survey of Militant Families in Pakistan. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 31(11), 973–994. https://doi. org/10.1080/10576100802400201
Baier, D., Manzoni, P., & Bergmann, M. C. (2016). Influencing Factors of Political Extremism in Adolescence. MONATSSCHRIFT FUR KRIMINOLOGIE UND STRAFRECHTSREFORM, 99(3), 171-198.
Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2012). The Edge of Violence: Towards Telling the Difference Between Violent and Non-Violent Radicalization. Terrorism and Political Violence, 24(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/095465 53.2011.594923
Berger, L. (2016). Local, National and Global Islam: Religious Guidance and European Muslim Public Opinion on Political Radicalism and Social Conservatism. West European Politics, 39(2), 205– 228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1062252
Berrebi, C. (2007). Evidence about the Link Between Education, Poverty and Terrorism among Palestinians. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 13(1), 38.
Bhui, K., Everitt, B., & Jones, E. (2014). Might Depression, Psychosocial Adversity, and Limited Social Assets Explain Vulnerability to and Resistance against Violent Radicalisation? PLoS ONE, 9(9), e105918. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105918
Bhui, K., Silva, M. J., Topciu, R. A., & Jones, E. (2016). Pathways to sympathies for violent protest and terrorism. British Journal of Psychiatry, 209(6), 483– 490. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.185173
Boehnke, K., Hagan, J., & Hefler, G. (1998). On the Development of Xenophobia in Germany: The Adolescent Years. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998. tb01237.x
Cardeli, E., Sideridis, G., Lincoln, A. K., Abdi, S. M., & Ellis, B. H. (2020). Social bonds in the diaspora: The application of social control theory to somali refugee young adults in resettlement. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000259
Charkawi, W., Dunn, K., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2021). The influences of social identity and perceptions of injustice on support to violent extremism. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 13(3), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2020.1734046
Cherney, A., & Murphy, K. (2019). Support for Terrorism: The Role of Beliefs in Jihad and Institutional Responses to Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 31(5), 1049–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 9546553.2017.131373529
Clemmow, C., Schumann, S., Salman, N. L., & Gill, P. (2020). The base rate study: developing base rates for risk factors and indicators for engagement in violent extremism. Journal of forensic sciences, 65(3), 865- 881.
Cording, J. R., & Christofferson, S. M. B. (2017). Theoretical and practical issues for the measurement of protective factors. Aggression and violent behavior, 32, 45-54.
Corner, E., Gill, P., & Mason, O. (2016). Mental Health Disorders and the Terrorist: A Research Note Probing Selection Effects and Disorder Prevalence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(6), 560–568. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/1057610X.2015.1120099
Costello, M., Hawdon, J., Ratliff, T., & Grantham, T. (2016). Who views online extremism? Individual attributes leading to exposure. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2016.05.033
Cragin, K., Bradley, M., Robinson, E., & Steinberg, P. (2015). What Factors Cause Youth to Reject Violent Extremism? Results of an Exploratory Analysis in the West Bank. RAND Corporation. https://doi. org/10.7249/RR1118
de Vries Robbé, M. (2014). Protective factors: Validation of the structured assessment of protective factors for violence risk in forensic psychiatry. Radbound University Nijmegen.
de Vries Robbé, M., & Willis, G. M. (2017). Assessment of protective factors in clinical practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 55–63
De Waele, M., & Pauwels, L. J. R. (2016). Why Do Flemish Youth Participate in Right-Wing Disruptive Groups? In C. L. Maxson & F.-A. Esbensen (Eds.), Gang Transitions and Transformations in an International Context (pp. 173–200). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-29602-9_10
Decker, S. H., & Pyrooz, D. C. (2019). Activism and Radicalism in Prison: Measurement and Correlates in a Large Sample of Inmates in Texas. Justice Quarterly, 36(5), 787–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.201 8.1462396
Delia Deckard, N., & Jacobson, D. (2015). The prosperous hardliner: Affluence, fundamentalism, and radicalization in Western European Muslim communities. Social Compass, 62(3), 412–433. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0037768615587827
Doosje, B., Bos, K. van den, Loseman, A., Feddes, A. R., & Mann, L. (2012). “My In-group is Superior!”: Susceptibility for Radical Right-wing Attitudes and Behaviors in Dutch Youth. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 5(3), 253–268. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1750-4716.2012.00099.x
Doosje, B., Loseman, A., & Bos, K. van den. (2013). Determinants of Radicalization of Islamic Youth in the Netherlands: Personal Uncertainty, Perceived Injustice, and Perceived Group Threat. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12030
Ellis, B. H., Abdi, S. M., Lazarevic, V., White, M. T., Lincoln, A. K., Stern, J. E., & Horgan, J. G. (2016). Relation of psychosocial factors to diverse behaviors and attitudes among Somali refugees. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 86(4), 393–408. https:// doi.org/10.1037/ort0000121
Ellis, B. H., Sideridis, G., Miller, A. B., Abdi, S. M., & Winer, J. P. (2019). Trauma, Trust in Government, and Social Connection: How Social Context Shapes Attitudes Related to the Use of Ideologically or Politically Motivated Violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/105761 0X.2019.1616929
Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2016). Risk, promotive, and protective factors in youth offending: Results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 63-70.
Feddes, A. R., Mann, L., & Doosje, B. (2015). Increasing self-esteem and empathy to prevent violent radicalization: A longitudinal quantitative evaluation of a resilience training focused on adolescents with a dual identity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(7), 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12307
Fitzpatrick, K. M. (1997). Fighting among America's youth: A risk and protective factors approach. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 131-148.
Gill, P. Marchment, Z. Grasby, P. and Clemmow, C. (2020). Protective Factors Against Violent Extremism. Report for CPNI.
Gøtzsche-Astrup, O. (2018). The time for causal designs: Review and evaluation of empirical support for mechanisms of political radicalisation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. avb.2018.02.003
Gøtzsche-Astrup, O. (2019). Personality moderates the relationship between uncertainty and political violence: Evidence from two large U.S. samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 102–109. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.006
Heffernan, R. & Ward, T. (2019). Dynamic Risk Factors, Protective Factors and Value-Laden Practices, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 26(2), 312-328.
Heffernan, R., & Ward, T. (2017). A comprehensive theory of dynamic risk and protective factors. Aggression and violent behavior, 37, 129-141.
Horgan, J. and Taylor, M. (2011). Disengagement, De-radicalization and the Arc of Terrorism: Future Directions for Research. In R. Coolsaet (Ed.) Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalization Challenge. (London: Ashgate).
Jahnke, S., Schröder, C. P., Goede, L.-R., Lehmann, L., Hauff, L., & Beelmann, A. (2020). Observer Sensitivity and Early Radicalization to Violence Among Young People in Germany. Social Justice Research, 33(3), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-020-00351-y
Jasko, K., LaFree, G., & Kruglanski, A. (2017). Quest for Significance and Violent Extremism: The Case of Domestic Radicalization. Political Psychology, 38(5), 815–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12376
Jensen, M., & Lafree, G., (2016) Final report: Empirical assessment of domestic radicalization (EADR). https:// www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/250481.pdf
Jolliffe, D., Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., & Pardini, D. (2016). Protective factors for violence: Results from the Pittsburgh Youth Study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 32-40.
Kewley, S. (2017). Strength based approaches and protective factors from a criminological perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 11–18. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.010
Klepfisz, G., Daffern, M., & Day, A. (2017). Understanding protective factors for violent reoffending in adults. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 80-87.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Bertelsen, P. (2020). Life psychology and significance quest: a complementary approach to violent extremism and counter-radicalisation. Journal of policing, intelligence and counter terrorism, 15(1), 1-22.
LaFree, G., Jensen, M. A., James, P. A., & Safer- Lichtenstein, A. (2018). Correlates of Violent Political Extremism in the United States*. Criminology, 56(2), 233–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12169
Levesque R.J.R. (2011) Social Control Theory. In: Levesque R.J.R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 4419-1695-2_410
Loeber, R. E., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M. E., & White, H. R. E. (2008). Introduction and key questions. In R. Loeber, D.P. Farrington, M. Southamer-Loeber & H.R.White (Eds.). Violence and serious theft: Development and prediction from childhood to adulthood. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group (pp3-23).
Lösel, F., & Bender, D. (2003). Protective factors and resilience. In Early Prevention of Adult Antisocial Behaviour (p. 75). Cambridge University Press.31 References
Lösel, F., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2 Suppl. 1), S8–S23.
Lösel, F., King, S., Bender, D., & Jugl, I. (2018). Protective Factors Against Extremism and Violent Radicalization: A Systematic Review of Research. International Journal of Developmental Science, 12(1– 2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-170241
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164
Maruna, S., & LeBel, T. P. (2003). Welcome home-examining the re-entry court concept from a strengths-based perspective. W. Criminology Rev., 4, 91.
McNeill, F. (2012). Four forms of ‘offender’ rehabilitation: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective: Forms of offender rehabilitation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 18–36. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02039.x
Miconi, D., Hassan, G., Oulhote, Y., & Rousseau, C. (n.d.). Sympathy for Violent Radicalization Among College Students in Quebec (Canada): The Protective Role of a Positive Future Orientation. 11.
Milla, M. N., & Hudiyana, J. (2019). The Protective Role of Friendship: Cross-group Friendship Mediates the Effect of Ideological Quest for Significance on Commitment to A Radical Group. Psychological Research on Urban Society, 2(2), 98. https://doi. org/10.7454/proust.v2i2.42
Muluk, H., Sumaktoyo, N. G., & Ruth, D. M. (2013). Jihad as justification: National survey evidence of belief in violent jihad as a mediating factor for sacred violence among Muslims in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 101–111. https://doi. org/10.1111/ajsp.12002
Nivette, A., Echelmeyer, L., Weerman, F., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2021). Understanding Changes in Violent Extremist Attitudes During the Transition to Early Adulthood. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09522-9
O'Shea, L. E., & Dickens, G. L. (2016). Performance of protective factors assessment in risk prediction for adults: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(2), 126.
Obaidi, M., Bergh, R., Sidanius, J., & Thomsen, L. (2018). The Mistreatment of My People: Victimization by Proxy and Behavioral Intentions to Commit Violence Among Muslims in Denmark. Political Psychology, 39(3), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12435
Ozer, S., & Bertelsen, P. (2019). Countering radicalization: An empirical examination from a life psychological perspective. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 25(3), 211–225. https://doi. org/10.1037/pac0000394
Pauwels, L. & De Waele. (2014). Youth Involvement in Politically Motivated Violence: Why Do Social Integration, Perceived Legitimacy, and Perceived Discrimination Matter? 8(1), 20.
Pauwels, L. J. R., & Svensson, R. (2017). How Robust Is the Moderating Effect of Extremist Beliefs on the Relationship Between Self-Control and Violent Extremism? Crime & Delinquency, 63(8), 1000–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716687757
Pauwels, L., & Schils, N. (2016). Differential Online Exposure to Extremist Content and Political Violence: Testing the Relative Strength of Social Learning and Competing Perspectives. Terrorism and Political Violence, 28(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/095465 53.2013.876414
Pearce, M. J., Jones, S. M., Schwab-Stone, M. E., & Ruchkin, V. (2003). The protective effects of religiousness and parent involvement on the development of conduct problems among youth exposed to violence. Child Development, 74(6), 1682–1696
Richards, A. (2015). Conceptualizing terrorism. OUP: Oxford.
Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and human behavior, 24(5), 595-605.
Rottweiler, B., & Gill, P. (2020). Conspiracy Beliefs and Violent Extremist Intentions: The Contingent Effects of Self-efficacy, Self-control and Law-related Morality. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1–20. https://doi.org /10.1080/09546553.2020.1803288
Rottweiler, B., Gill, P., & Bouhana, N. (2021). Individual and Environmental Explanations for Violent Extremist Intentions: A German Nationally Representative Survey Study. Justice Quarterly, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1869807
Rousseau, C., Hassan, G., Miconi, D., Lecompte, V., Mekki-Berrada, A., El Hage, H., & Oulhote, Y. (2019). From social adversity to sympathy for violent radicalization: The role of depression, religiosity and social support. Archives of Public Health, 77(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-019-0372-y
Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57(3), 316.
Serin, R. C., Chadwick, N., & Lloyd, C. D. (2016). Dynamic risk and protective factors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1-2), 151-170.
Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022728
Tausch, N., Spears, R., & Christ, O. (2009). Religious and National Identity as Predictors of Attitudes towards the 7/7 Bombings among British Muslims: An Analysis of UK Opinion Poll Data. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, Tome 22(3), 103–126.
Trujillo, H. M., Prados, M., & Moyano, M. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the activism and radicalism intention scale / Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la escala de intención de activismo y radicalismo. International Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 157–189. https:// doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2015.1101317
van Bergen, D. D., Ersanilli, E. F., Pels, T. V. M., & De Ruyter, D. J. (2016). Turkish-Dutch youths’ attitude toward violence for defending the in-group: What role does perceived parenting play? Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22(2), 120–133. https:// doi.org/10.1037/pac0000173
van Bergen, D. D., Feddes, A. F., Doosje, B., & Pels, T. V. M. (2015). Collective identity factors and the attitude toward violence in defense of ethnicity or religion among Muslim youth of Turkish and Moroccan Descent. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 47, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.026
Walker, K., Bowen, E., & Brown, S. (2013). Psychological and criminological factors associated with desistance from violence: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.021
Whyman, R. (2019). Strengths, resources or controls? The assessment of protective factors in probation practice. Probation Journal, 66(2), 219-235.
Williamson, H., Murphy, K., & Sargeant, E. (2020). The grievance-identity relationship: Understanding the role of identity processes and stigmatisation on Muslims’ perceptions of terrorist grievances. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 15(3), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2020.181 7526
Wolfowicz, M., Litmanovitz, Y., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2020). A Field-Wide Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Putative Risk and Protective Factors for Radicalization Outcomes. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36(3), 407–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10940-019-09439-4
Zaidise, E., Canetti-Nisim, D., & Pedahzur, A. (2007). Politics of God or Politics of Man? The Role of Religion and Deprivation in Predicting Support for Political Violence in Israel. Political Studies, 55(3), 499–521.
As part of CREST’s commitment to open access research, this text is available under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 licence. Please refer to our Copyright page for full details.
IMAGE CREDITS: Copyright ©2022 R. Stevens / CREST (CC BY-SA 4.0)